Follow our news and updates
Get marketing tips, how-to's, and more!
Follow our news and updates
Get marketing tips, how-to's, and more!
Follow our news and updates
Get marketing tips, how-to's, and more!
Follow our news and updates
Get marketing tips, how-to's, and more!
AI-generated search features, like Google’s AI Overviews, are changing the way people consume information online. But as these features pull information from across the web, a key question arises:
Are AI Overviews citing more AI-generated content than human-written content?
At Theia Media, we’ve been exploring this question because it has major implications for SEO and brand visibility. If Google’s AI-driven summaries are increasingly citing AI-generated content, we could be watching the early stages of an AI-to-AI feedback loop that reshapes the web.
Researchers analyzed one million search engine results pages (SERPs) that displayed Google AI Overviews. For each SERP, they extracted the top three cited links - 1.9 million URLs in total - and cross-referenced them with a database of 500,000 pages.
Each page was then run through an AI content detection tool to categorize it as:
This gave us a clear picture of how much AI-generated content is actually being cited by AI Overviews.
Here’s what the analysis revealed:
Within that mixed group:
This means that almost 9 out of 10 pages cited by AI Overviews contain some form of AI-generated content.
When compared to a separate analysis of 900,000 new pages across the web (which showed only 2.5% pure AI and 25.8% pure human), AI Overviews appear to be drawing disproportionately from AI-generated or AI-assisted content.
We’re potentially witnessing a self-reinforcing cycle:
This doesn’t mean Google is being careless. In fact, the company has said it uses “grounding” techniques like retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to improve accuracy. But with 74% of new webpages including some level of AI-generated content, it may simply reflect the state of the modern web.
The study also calculated the correlation between the percentage of AI content on a page and the order of citations in AI Overviews. The result? 0.017 - effectively zero.
This indicates that Google isn’t explicitly rewarding or penalizing pages for being AI-generated or human-written when choosing sources for AI Overviews. It’s simply pulling from the content ecosystem that exists today.
For businesses, this has two key implications:
At Theia Media, we’ve helped brands use AI to accelerate content creation without sacrificing quality. For example, we’ve guided clients to produce AI-assisted articles enriched with original research, expert commentary, and case studies - ensuring the content is unique enough to stand out in both traditional and AI-driven search environments.
We’re watching the rise of an AI content ecosystem where machines increasingly pull from content made by other machines. For now, this doesn’t appear to hurt rankings or visibility - but it does highlight the importance of producing content that’s genuinely valuable.
As AI search features grow, your strategy shouldn’t be to avoid AI entirely but to use it responsibly - pairing its efficiency with human expertise to create content that earns trust, links, and visibility across both traditional and AI-driven search results.
These Stories on AI
Meet Us (By Appointment):
677 N Washington Blvd, Suite 45 Sarasota, FL 34236
Call: (941) 444-1945
Email: hello@theiamedia.agency